Bigfoot Spotted By Man on a Horse


Llama Monster on youtube shared this report from the BFRO about a bigfoot being spotted by a man on horseback. The famous Patterson Gimlin incident occurred when they were on horseback. Is there something to this?

Comments

  1. Is this site dying? There hasn't been an intelligent discussion about the possible existence of bigfoot in ages. Believe it or not, a few years back, this site was a non-goofy serious site with serious comments. Now it's a joke forum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was before the main troll Joe F(uckhead) came along with his bigotry and abuse.

      Delete
    2. yeah, that Joe guy is a bloodclaht boy.

      Delete
    3. I think there are many reasons why the discussion of Bigfoot has degenerated here and on other sites. First of all outside of stories, there has been no real recent compelling evidence brought forth. We read of constant promises such as the recent one by Todd Standing and they all come to naught. One can only have their hopes dashed so many times before they become cynical. The Finding Bigfoot series has been going on for 9 seasons, traveling all over the country and world without any success or evidence to show for it. You have crazy people coming out of the woodwork such as Dr. Matthew Johnson which adds to the ridicule. We have had constant advancements in technology such as game cameras, night vision and drones and still no success. So yes, it's taken less seriously every year. You will always have your core of believers but it appears to me to becoming more of a social event where people of like mind can bond thru their belief (like religion). The more wild claims and stories produced without evidence the more it will become ridiculed. I think it could be said of those advocating Bigfoot's existence:

      "We have met the enemy. . . and he is us."

      Delete
    4. I can feel you trembling in fear from here, 7:59, at the thought that Sasquatch is real.

      You have become such a joke with all the crap you try and shovel down people's throats in your attempt to feel safe that it has become quite pathetic. I giggle at the thought of you too scared to take your trash out once it gets dark.

      Yes, you write that you come here to get your jollies while trying to psychoanalyze believers and knowers, but we all know the truth. Bashing others makes you feel superior and thus safer somehow.

      Smug away, but know that we all recognize you shaking in your boots. BOO!!! I'll bet I scared you!

      Delete
    5. At least I’m not a fat middle aged loser pretending to be a woman on a Bigfoot blog.

      Delete
    6. Amateur researchers are easy pickings. They tend to lack certain credentials that cyber-career pseudosceptics are drawn to because it feeds their self-serving need for importance. To feel like they’re doing good in the world. But it comes down to one simple fact that the reason they’re drawn to such amateurs, is because it’s their level. It’s always far easier to just special plead away the solid evidence backed by people with the relevant credentials.

      Without coming across too personal Curious, it’s always very humorous to me when a pseudosceptic cites the myth that there is no compelling evidence, when 99% of you don’t even know what physical evidence constitutes. It's hard to ignore the usual narcissism in such a sentiment which is due to a very typical pseudosceptical pedestal of not having to provide when the tables are turned. Time and time again, I keep reading pseudosceptics maintaining that the subject is pretty clear cut. Yet I also keep reading the same efforts at giving themselves a head start which amounts to gross special pleading; “there is no evidence”. Isn't it ironic that for a group of people who religiously hide behind Scientism, a quasi-religious-like mindset that (according to them) propels them to a pedestal where they (feel like) they don't have to abide by very basic scientific principles (ironic huh?). Isn't it ironic that they should need such an uneven playing field to achieve that, for something allegedly so "clear cut"? There is no better example of this in your sentiment, Curious, in that after being presented with the facts about evidence that you’ll no doubt divert to, "well if the evidence was good enough, all the scientists in the world would know about it”. Well if you weren’t already partial to special pleading, the fact that you’ve been listed the best in relevant fields who are indeed aware of it, would certainly seal any such notion. It’s just that you need a body to classify. And for a body, you need professionals on a long funded expedition.

      And the reason this place is barren, is because one troll has spent his entire unemployed existence trying to drive away anyone who wants to commit to discussion. I don’t need to prove this... because next time someone comes along here, read the aggression in his reaction yourself. But you do know this, Curious. And anyone bypassing that glaringly obvious fact for the idea that the subject is dwindling... is probably a little too much in need of some closure. Thank god so many of you have those amateur researchers to obsess over, eh?

      Delete
    7. Spot on Iktomi !
      The one troll (stuey as people call him) has made it his passion to engage in drama with believers on here . i have been at the end of his personal vendetta many a time where he posts his smutty responses pretending to be me . It's obvious the poor bloke has no life of any kind outside of typing away on his keyboard in the basement with his greasy swollen fingers. Little does he know there is a great world just outside his basement if only he went out to venture around. He's content raising the ire of those on here who try to have intelligent discussions
      So sad his life has become a joke

      Joe

      Delete
    8. ^ Wow, something really triggered the sock puppets into posting some meandering nonsense today Ha Ha Ha!

      Delete
    9. Isn’t it it ironic that an iron headed ignoramus (ironic isn’t it?) repeatedly labels thing ironic (that sure is ironic, huh?) when (quite ironically) he doesn’t even know what irony means, but he ironically calls things ironic because his iron brain ironically thinks that it makes him look intelligent (how’s that for irony?).

      Delete
    10. How ironic that the man on the horse painted spots on Bigfoot

      Delete
    11. lol at ikdummy. ikdummy wades in pseudoscience so ikdummy calls scientists "pseudoskeptics".

      I read your "debate" with Andy White and by your own admission and quote, you come off as an idiot. I literally felt hurt for you, even though you are despicable, that is how bad you were clobbered, and Andy White was being extremely nice and accommodating. Joe/ikdummy has such a sick desire for tall imaginary apemen that he will twist science to promote his perversion. Shame on Joe/ikdummy.

      Delete
    12. ^ Lol, Ikdummy was made to look quite the english fool by Andy White PHD!! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha.

      Delete
    13. Ha ha ha ha ha! Just like Iktomi makes you look the fool year after year after year. Your ego has taken quite the battering these last years trying to come close to Iktomi's knowledge.

      Delete
    14. And here’s that comment section;

      http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/bigfoot-researchers-still-insist-native-american-skull-is-not-human

      ... I’m happy with my contribution to his comment section if I’m honest.

      HEY UNO!!

      Delete
    15. if Uno really thinks ikdummy has knowledge, he/she must be in dire straits. ikdummy is an idiot. It is just fun ridiculing one of these moronic arrogant bigfoot buffoons on an uncensored forum. It's like being able to smack around a corrupt politician and not be arrested.

      Delete
    16. Yes, ikdummy, you're too stupid to realize you looked like a total fool. You're the clichéd idiot that doesn't know he's an idiot....but you did admit you were an idiot in the "debate", so maybe you really have awareness.

      Delete
    17. Amateur researchers just like you Ikdummy! If you're not in the field, you don't have a clue!
      This place is barren because of all the yo-yo waste your time researchers featured here, who never have proof!
      But Ikdummy isn't here for proof, he's here for Stuey, and anyone else he can troll.

      BEYOND PROOF RIGHT HERE!!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMkQXIiLewE

      Delete
    18. Howdy Iktomi!

      I am thankful for your contribution to this comment section. You keep the cement heads rolling off their scrawny necks with your smack downs!

      Delete
    19. ikdummy posted the link above, DS.

      Press CTRL-F to do a page search for "idiot" on that page. ikdummy literally writes: "Admittedly, sometimes I'm an idiot." ikdummy really knows he's a fool. No normal person frames themselves that way.

      Delete
    20. You are wrong, DS, in your assumption as to why this blog is choking.

      Delete
    21. First of all the reply from "Curious" at 9:40 was not me but hey, if the shoe fits . . . Also there are plenty of things to be worried about other than the existence of Sasquatch and in truth I would welcome it's existence

      Okay lktomi, with all this ponderous amount of evidence that 99% of us are overlooking, why is it not being presented by your professional experts in the proper formats? Yes, they are successful in convincing those who already want to believe but they don't seem to be making a dent in the skeptical arena. What good is evidence when it never proves anything? You talk of special pleading which I chuckle at because the Bigfoot community is ripe with examples of special pleading.
      It's always they're too fast, too smart, better hearing, eyesight, smell - whatever. All this surmised without one single specimen to make these assumptions.
      As for the professionals going on a long, well funded expedition - well, you have the professionals as you always have stated and if you have the numbers of people who truly believe than it should be no problem for them to start a GoFundMe campaign and raise the money for doing so. The rewards for such a venture being successful would be immense both in prestige and in financial reward. However these same professionals seem to be content in preaching to the choir at Bigfoot conferences and collecting their fees. It seems that the Bigfoot community cannot even agree among themselves how to go about proving it's existence or what constitutes evidence only that it exists so perhaps any such venture would be doomed to failure. I do believe there is a mystery here but now have moved on from a flesh and blood animal (or a inter-dimensional one). Why are there people who insist they have seen a Bigfoot and so eager to share their experience with others as we have seen with these stories posted here day after day? If it is so important to them why do they not in mass petition the government to investigate?

      I'm curious to see how Todd Standing's case comes out. I predict nothing will come of it . . . as usual.

      Delete
    22. DS just couldn't resist posting yet another one of his youtube links of crayola creatures he swears is evidence.
      poor DS, wastes his time along the footpaths behind his house looking for tree bark that looks like creatures but is in fact....tree bark

      Joe

      Delete
    23. 12:23 - Hey, if the shoe fits, your cement head seems to be rolling down the street!

      Delete
    24. You're low class, Uno. Shame!

      Delete
    25. Curious, don’t you know that Meldrum’s impeccable bigfoot research has been published in a certain world renowned, peer reviewed scientific journal?

      In fact the same “peer reviewed scientific journal” has punished these beauties:

      “A Case of a Japanese Child with Past-Life Memories”

      “Things You Can Do When You’re Dead: True Accounts of After Death Communication”

      “Consistency in Eyewitness Reports of Aquatic ‘Monsters’”

      Ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    26. “Okay lktomi, with all this ponderous amount of evidence that 99% of us are overlooking, why is it not being presented by your professional experts in the proper formats?”
      You see, this is the usual rhetorical approach that I’m accustomed to. Even when pseudosceptics demanded that the current evidence be published in a journal, it was pointed out that in terms of biological research pre-classification, that it doesn’t happen. When the evidence finally ended up getting published, you now take an even more rhetorical stance demanding “proper formats”? I’m sorry Mr Curious, but by whose authority does the assertion that all scientists enthusiastic of the subject were never sceptical come from? I don’t think you have the insight to be making such claims. I’m very used to this typical pseudoscpetical rhetorical drivel that anyone presenting an enthusiastic approach is automatically untrustworthy. That’s basic ad hominem. I’d be curious to know who would be trustworthy.

      What good is evidence without proof? Here we come full circle to the way in which people like you fail to understand the relevance of certain physical evidence. It’s only as good as it’s utilised to broaden research, resulting in potential proof. You see in field biology solid evidence doesn’t have to mean a body or a means of classification. You can have very reliable, very credible forms of physical evidence, by which field biologists base the majority of their research on for mammal surveys. In comparison to other mammals, we have in American hominins the foot print evidence that goes far beyond the average data that would be good enough to show the presence of any other mammal, essentially appeasing the extraordinary demands pseudosceptics place upon said evidence before it’s “credible”... but it’s still not good enough. This is because the existing physical evidence mirrors that which is being widely reported... Thus in needs a panic-ridden blanket denial response because it’s very obvious what that evidence entails.

      Curious, you reeled off attributes that wild primates enjoy like they’re some fantastic preternatural talents from the most far fetched of imaginations. The thing is, based on the quality of evidence that supports the innumerable sightings reports, there‘s no reason to doubt they’re existence. If they exist, then they must evade in line with attributes evolved in wilderness areas that make our civilised ways far inferior. Therefore, attributing things like speed, intelligence, better hearing, better eyesight & smell... All of which are basic traits of recognised primates is pretty much common sense. There are also three databases of reports to collect data from & theorise about things like behaviour, leaving no need for mere assumptions. Argh yes... Another GoFundMe campaign that gets stricken with allegations of fraud, correct? Wouldn’t you just love more of that? Credible scientific research doesn’t really begin with GoFundMe campaigns? It has the adequate academic, professional backing & resources so things like footage (which eventually proved the existence of the Bili Ape) is considered credible with no excuses. And your “preaching” is in fact what scientists & authors have always done; toured seminars for their hard work. If more people want to attend and pay then this is evidence of their ideas becoming more accepted. Where else are people interested in this subject going to go for their curiosity? The finances to fund more research aren't coming from anywhere else... I can imagine that if everyone did what the pseudosceptics wanted and stopped going to conventions, stopped touring seminars and writing books, and essentially stopped evolving research and ideas on a collective level, then pseudosceptics would simply question where the community was? Let me guess... “dwindling away”?

      You folk love trying to have it both ways.

      Delete
    27. And for Stuart...

      "Because most (but not all) of these cases develop among persons who believe in reincarnation, we should expect that the informants for the cases would interpret them as examples according with their belief; and they usually do. It is necessary, however, for scientists to think of alternative explanations. The most obvious explanation of these cases attributes the birthmark or birth defect on the child to chance, and the reports of the child's statements and unusual behavior then become a parental fiction intended to account for the birthmark (or birth dcl'cct) in terms of the culturally accepted belief in rein- carnation."
      https://med.virginia.edu/perceptual-studies/wp-content/uploads/sites/267/2015/11/STE39stevenson-1.pdf

      ... That’s the logical approach the journal that published Meldrum’s research has, and simply doesn’t have the scientific snobbery to put such topics under scientific scrutiny.

      Delete
    28. ikdummy has such belief in bigfoot that his narrative on bigfoot has been reshaped to where it's now a homo sapien whose bones and culture overlap modern homo sapiens.

      ikdummy is such a great debater that over time he was pushed to define bigfoot as indistinguishable from native Americans, except for the hair. Way to stand your ground, ikdummy. Rationalize all you want, ikdummy, but your opinion was molded by these "pseudoskeptics", you chimp. LOL

      Delete
    29. ikdummy has such belief in bigfoot that his narrative on bigfoot has been reshaped to where it's now a homo sapien whose bones and culture overlap modern homo sapiens.

      ikdummy is such a great debater that over time he was pushed to define bigfoot as indistinguishable from native Americans, except for the hair. Way to stand your ground, ikdummy. Rationalize all you want, ikdummy, but your opinion was molded by these "pseudoskeptics", you chimp. LOL

      Delete
    30. HHAHAHAHAAHA!!! ikdummy just had a clean removal of a post.,,, not just "this comment was removed".

      Delete
    31. 12:35 i could easily post pics every single day if i wanted.
      This is Bigfoot evidence, and you complain about me posting evidence?
      Troll!

      Delete
  2. Doorways on the surface of planet Mars...pretty much just like was said...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1A8BLawaRo

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why did the man on the horse paint spots on Bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would fingerprint Bigfoot myself, I would run my paint covered fingers up and down his big hairy body

      Delete
  4. The credibility of both Dr. Meldrum and Dr. Bindernagel took a nose dive when they both fell for Todd Standing's bigfoot BS. This proves that these guys are too gullible to be entirely objective bigfoot researchers.

    For those like me who respect these two guys, this is exceedingly painful to watch:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJma7EZES6U

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're a troll, and a mental midget with a baby dick. How's living with your gay dad and whore mother?

      Delete
    2. You must freeze the stool as soon as you collect it, only pick up warm or steaming stool samples and run right home and put them in your freezer

      Delete
    3. Willy Wonka up there knows all about producing stool samples at his “chocolate factory”!

      Delete
  5. The title sounds like a poorly written Porno!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story